multocida, and its activity against B. https://zithromaxstore.org/.
An interesting ‘Viewpoint’ appeared in this month’s issue of Communications of the ACM. In Time for computer science to grow up, Lance Fornow argues that because the field of computer science at large is maturing, we need to switch our attention from publishing deadline-driven conference papers, often conforming to the “least-publishable unit”, to well worked out archival journal papers. I cannot agree more. Lance provides several arguments in favor of publishing journal papers rather than conference papers, but ignores one important one. When computer science researchers are evaluated among scientists from more traditional disciplines , reviewers typically compare their published journals rather than their conference papers. As conference papers are often considered unimportant in other disciplines. The paper is online at: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1536616.1536631

Regarding the broken publishing model is interesting also this proposal: http://www.lecun.com/ex/pamphlets/publishing-models.html and it is even more interesting considering the anecdote about the SIFT paper.
Thanks Marco, interesting pointer. I was unaware that Lowe had such a hard time getting SIFT published. Quite surprising.